LATVIJA.FM
Jāzeps Grosvalds: A Modernist Between Riga and the World
Elegant, curious, and restlessly modern, Jāzeps “Džo” Grosvalds moved with ease from the salons of Paris to the dunes of Arabia and the trenches of the Eastern Front. He brought back to Latvia a cosmopolitan vocabulary—post-impressionist color, expressionist edge, and crisp modernist geometries—and fused it with themes close to home: refugees, riflemen, city outskirts, and northern light. Though he died young in 1920, his cycles on Latvian Riflemen, Refugees, and the Orient made him a bridge between European avant-gardes and Latvian experience. Today, his canvases in the Latvian National Museum of Art still feel startlingly fresh—pages from a diary that turned a life of travel and service into an art of seeing.
A Riga Upbringing: Culture as a First Language
Born in Riga in 1891 to lawyer Frīdrihs Grosvalds, young Jāzeps grew up in an apartment that doubled as a salon for writers, artists, and scholars. Culture was a first language: foreign tongues, piano, drawing, and the habit of looking closely. He studied at the Riga City Gymnasium (1901–1909), absorbing classical languages and European history while sketching compulsively. Crucially, he learned to navigate between bourgeois discipline and artistic curiosity—a balance that would give his later modernism unusual clarity. In 1909 he headed to Germany, visiting the art historian Kurt Glaser, who showed him original van Gogh works and Manet prints—shock encounters that sharpened his appetite for the new. A term at Simon Hollósy’s school in Munich followed; the academy’s methods felt narrow to him, so the real magnet became Paris, where a broader, looser schooling in looking—museums by day, studios and cafés by night—waited to be taken in.
Paris Lessons: Building a Modernist Vocabulary
From 1910 to 1914, Grosvalds studied at private academies such as La Palette, working under painters like Kees van Dongen and absorbing the grammar of Cézanne, Degas, Renoir and other moderns. The city’s rhythm—theaters, boulevards, working-class outskirts—pushed him beyond picturesque subjects toward structure, silhouette, and atmosphere. His Paris period nurtured a palette capable of pearl greys, coppery violets, and disciplined patches of color, while his drawings tightened to crisp, economical line. Importantly, he learned what not to paint: ornament for ornament’s sake. The lesson was composition—how to stage a scene so light and form carry emotion without theatrical excess. He visited Spain in 1914, noting sun-cracked walls and severe horizons, and returned briefly to Riga just as war broke out. With fellow young artists Konrāds Ubāns, Voldemārs Tone, Aleksandrs Drēviņš, he helped form Zaļā puķe (Green Flower), a circle that seeded the Expressionists’ Group and, soon after, the Riga Artists’ Group—a generation intent on crafting a distinctly Latvian modernism.
The War Years: Riflemen, Refugees, and a New Gravitas
Mobilized in 1915, Grosvalds served as a cavalry officer with the 6th Tukums Latvian Riflemen Regiment, leading a scout unit. The front changed his eye. The painter of café foyers became the recorder of columns on muddy roads, exhausted faces, improvised bivouacs. Two great cycles were born: “Bēgļi / Refugees” (1915–1917) and “Latviešu strēlnieki / Latvian Riflemen” (1916–1917). Here his modernist economy proved vital: flat planes, pared-down gestures, and a somber register of browns, whites, and greys turned crowds into choruses, individuals into types without losing dignity. Works like “White Crosses” (1916) compress grief into measured intervals of shape and space; the emotion is distilled, never sentimental. Even as he drew on European modernism, the subject was unmistakably Latvian—a people in movement, a nation under strain. Grosvalds showed that modern form could carry local truth, opening a path for Latvian art to be both international in method and national in feeling.
Eastward Gaze: Arabia, Persia, and the Oriental Cycle
In 1917–1918, Grosvalds was attached to Allied forces and then served as a British First Lieutenant with the British Expeditionary Group, traveling through Arabia, Persia, and the Caucasus; he was awarded the Military Cross. The journey yielded an outpouring of drawings and paintings—his “Oriental cycle” (1918–1919)—including “A Street in Baghdad,” “Oriental Landscape,” and portraits of women and traders caught in slanting light. Rather than exoticize, he simplified the architecture to volumes, letting turrets, arcades, and long walls become instruments of rhythm. Color warmed: saffron, date-palm green, indigo shade, set against pale dust. The discipline of the war cycles remained—clean horizons, controlled masses—but now bathed in dry air and slow sunlight. This was not touristic Orientalism; it was modernist humanism, recognizing kinship across deserts and rivers. Back in Europe, these works positioned Grosvalds as a European artist with Latvian roots, mapping far geographies with the same clarity he brought to Riga’s outskirts and Baltic fields.
Diplomat by Duty, Artist by Nature: The Final Chapter
Demobilized in 1919, Grosvalds stepped from uniform to diplomacy, replacing his brother Olģerts as secretary of the Latvian delegation at the Paris Peace Conference, later serving at the Embassy of Latvia in Paris. Even amid cables and communiqués, he kept sketchbooks open: boulevards after rain, quiet bridges, faces in profile. The dual calling—art and statecraft—suited him; both required exact observation and economy of means. Then, abruptly, the Spanish flu ended his life on 1 February 1920. His ashes rested at Père Lachaise before reburial in Riga’s Great Cemetery (1925). The brevity of his years—just twenty-eight as an exhibiting artist—feels shocking measured against the range of his subjects and consistency of his voice. In the space between Paris studios, Latvian barracks, and Mesopotamian streets, he forged a unified sensibility: restrained, humane, and unmistakably modern.
Afterlife of an Oeuvre: Cycles, Collections, Continuities
Grosvalds’ legacy rests on cycles—a novelist’s way of painting stories in chapters. Refugees, Riflemen, and the Orient together shape an arc from displacement and endurance to encounter and openness. Exhibited across Riga, Petrograd, Moscow, Paris, and later Stockholm, his works influenced peers in the Riga Artists’ Group and continue to anchor Latvian modernist narratives. The Latvian National Museum of Art holds a major memorial collection—thousands of items spanning oils, drawings, watercolors—while signature canvases like “A Street in Baghdad,” “Old Refugee,” and “Path of the Nightmare” circulate in reproduction, teaching new viewers the shock of less-is-more. What endures is balance: European Modernism pared to essentials, joined to Latvian themes without folklore costume or rhetoric. In an age of noise, Grosvalds offers clarity—an artist who could see across borders and make of that seeing a Latvian art that belongs to the world.
Born in Riga in 1891 to lawyer Frīdrihs Grosvalds, young Jāzeps grew up in an apartment that doubled as a salon for writers, artists, and scholars. Culture was a first language: foreign tongues, piano, drawing, and the habit of looking closely. He studied at the Riga City Gymnasium (1901–1909), absorbing classical languages and European history while sketching compulsively. Crucially, he learned to navigate between bourgeois discipline and artistic curiosity—a balance that would give his later modernism unusual clarity. In 1909 he headed to Germany, visiting the art historian Kurt Glaser, who showed him original van Gogh works and Manet prints—shock encounters that sharpened his appetite for the new. A term at Simon Hollósy’s school in Munich followed; the academy’s methods felt narrow to him, so the real magnet became Paris, where a broader, looser schooling in looking—museums by day, studios and cafés by night—waited to be taken in.
Paris Lessons: Building a Modernist Vocabulary
From 1910 to 1914, Grosvalds studied at private academies such as La Palette, working under painters like Kees van Dongen and absorbing the grammar of Cézanne, Degas, Renoir and other moderns. The city’s rhythm—theaters, boulevards, working-class outskirts—pushed him beyond picturesque subjects toward structure, silhouette, and atmosphere. His Paris period nurtured a palette capable of pearl greys, coppery violets, and disciplined patches of color, while his drawings tightened to crisp, economical line. Importantly, he learned what not to paint: ornament for ornament’s sake. The lesson was composition—how to stage a scene so light and form carry emotion without theatrical excess. He visited Spain in 1914, noting sun-cracked walls and severe horizons, and returned briefly to Riga just as war broke out. With fellow young artists Konrāds Ubāns, Voldemārs Tone, Aleksandrs Drēviņš, he helped form Zaļā puķe (Green Flower), a circle that seeded the Expressionists’ Group and, soon after, the Riga Artists’ Group—a generation intent on crafting a distinctly Latvian modernism.
The War Years: Riflemen, Refugees, and a New Gravitas
Mobilized in 1915, Grosvalds served as a cavalry officer with the 6th Tukums Latvian Riflemen Regiment, leading a scout unit. The front changed his eye. The painter of café foyers became the recorder of columns on muddy roads, exhausted faces, improvised bivouacs. Two great cycles were born: “Bēgļi / Refugees” (1915–1917) and “Latviešu strēlnieki / Latvian Riflemen” (1916–1917). Here his modernist economy proved vital: flat planes, pared-down gestures, and a somber register of browns, whites, and greys turned crowds into choruses, individuals into types without losing dignity. Works like “White Crosses” (1916) compress grief into measured intervals of shape and space; the emotion is distilled, never sentimental. Even as he drew on European modernism, the subject was unmistakably Latvian—a people in movement, a nation under strain. Grosvalds showed that modern form could carry local truth, opening a path for Latvian art to be both international in method and national in feeling.
Eastward Gaze: Arabia, Persia, and the Oriental Cycle
In 1917–1918, Grosvalds was attached to Allied forces and then served as a British First Lieutenant with the British Expeditionary Group, traveling through Arabia, Persia, and the Caucasus; he was awarded the Military Cross. The journey yielded an outpouring of drawings and paintings—his “Oriental cycle” (1918–1919)—including “A Street in Baghdad,” “Oriental Landscape,” and portraits of women and traders caught in slanting light. Rather than exoticize, he simplified the architecture to volumes, letting turrets, arcades, and long walls become instruments of rhythm. Color warmed: saffron, date-palm green, indigo shade, set against pale dust. The discipline of the war cycles remained—clean horizons, controlled masses—but now bathed in dry air and slow sunlight. This was not touristic Orientalism; it was modernist humanism, recognizing kinship across deserts and rivers. Back in Europe, these works positioned Grosvalds as a European artist with Latvian roots, mapping far geographies with the same clarity he brought to Riga’s outskirts and Baltic fields.
Diplomat by Duty, Artist by Nature: The Final Chapter
Demobilized in 1919, Grosvalds stepped from uniform to diplomacy, replacing his brother Olģerts as secretary of the Latvian delegation at the Paris Peace Conference, later serving at the Embassy of Latvia in Paris. Even amid cables and communiqués, he kept sketchbooks open: boulevards after rain, quiet bridges, faces in profile. The dual calling—art and statecraft—suited him; both required exact observation and economy of means. Then, abruptly, the Spanish flu ended his life on 1 February 1920. His ashes rested at Père Lachaise before reburial in Riga’s Great Cemetery (1925). The brevity of his years—just twenty-eight as an exhibiting artist—feels shocking measured against the range of his subjects and consistency of his voice. In the space between Paris studios, Latvian barracks, and Mesopotamian streets, he forged a unified sensibility: restrained, humane, and unmistakably modern.
Afterlife of an Oeuvre: Cycles, Collections, Continuities
Grosvalds’ legacy rests on cycles—a novelist’s way of painting stories in chapters. Refugees, Riflemen, and the Orient together shape an arc from displacement and endurance to encounter and openness. Exhibited across Riga, Petrograd, Moscow, Paris, and later Stockholm, his works influenced peers in the Riga Artists’ Group and continue to anchor Latvian modernist narratives. The Latvian National Museum of Art holds a major memorial collection—thousands of items spanning oils, drawings, watercolors—while signature canvases like “A Street in Baghdad,” “Old Refugee,” and “Path of the Nightmare” circulate in reproduction, teaching new viewers the shock of less-is-more. What endures is balance: European Modernism pared to essentials, joined to Latvian themes without folklore costume or rhetoric. In an age of noise, Grosvalds offers clarity—an artist who could see across borders and make of that seeing a Latvian art that belongs to the world.